gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_unref()

Bug #859325 reported by Nick Brooker
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

First boot after upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10. Logged into Gnome Classic.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: gnome-terminal 3.0.1-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic-pae 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Sep 26 14:48:59 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-terminal
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: gnome-terminal
ProcCwd: /home/nick
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en
 LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb6e884e3 <g_variant_unref+35>: lock xadd %eax,0x14(%esi)
 PC (0xb6e884e3) ok
 source "%eax" ok
 destination "0x14(%esi)" (0x00000014) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
StacktraceTop:
 g_variant_unref () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_settings_get () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_type_create_instance () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_unref()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-09-26 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare vboxusers wireshark

Revision history for this message
Nick Brooker (nickbrooker) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #816299, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.