Property fields not completely deleted

[Eric Caudal - www.elico-corp.com]

When deleting the accounting properties of a product (eg income account) in the product itself, the corresponding entry in ir.property is not deleted properly: the entry remains with value_reference empty which is not very logical.
Indeed, in this case, the search by category doesnot work and the one in the product (empty) is selected, which makes very few sense as this is the one necessary for the invoice, which remains empty in this case.

[Amit Parik (amit-parik)]

Hello Eric,

I have checked your bug report but I didn't get your point exactly what you want to specified or where you have faced the problem.

So would you please elaborate more on this or provide the precious example on this.

Thanks and waiting for your reply!

[Eric Caudal - www.elico-corp.com (elicoidal)]

Please find enclosed the screenshoot concerning the product definition
(first with account then I deleted the account in the product definition).
the record 115993 should be completely deleted and not set to null
(which could potentially make OE crash as it doesnot find an account)
Best regards

openerp

*Eric CAUDAL*, CEO
<email address hidden> <mailto:<email address hidden>>
Cell: + 86 186 2136 1670
*Elico Corp - OpenERP Ready Partner, Shanghai.*
http://www.openerp.net.cn

On 18/10/2011 12:36, Amit Parik (OpenERP) wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> I have checked your bug report but I didn't get your point exactly what
> you want to specified or where you have faced the problem.
>
> So would you please elaborate more on this or provide the precious
> example on this.
>
> Thanks and waiting for your reply!
>
> ** Changed in: openobject-addons
> Status: New => Incomplete
>

[Amit Parik (amit-parik)]

Hello Eric,

Thanks for your reply and screen-shots!

[Naresh(OpenERP) (nch-openerp)]

Hello Eric,

Thanks for reporting the issue!

The issue has been fixed at lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-server/trunk-bug-858903-nch with revision-info:3780 <email address hidden> and will be merged soon to the trunk server.

Regards,

[Vo Minh Thu (thu)]

It seems to me that when you set a field to some value, you expect to see that value in the field. And as it happens, the field we talk about is a property field. So you set the property field (which has to exist); you are not deleting it.

As for the potential problem you mention (the referenced record doesn't exist), there is code in the framework to deal with this case. Please add more information and re-open the bug report if needed.