Old testtools output expected in test_selftest tests
Bug #815423 reported by
Jelmer Vernooij
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bazaar |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Jelmer Vernooij | ||
2.4 |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Martin Packman |
Bug Description
Various tests are currently failing because the output of testtools has changed:
For an example, see:
I wonder if we should check specific output here; these tests seem more appropriate for testtools.
Related branches
lp:~jelmer/bzr/testtools-0.9.12
- Martin Pool: Needs Fixing
- Andrew Bennetts: Approve
-
Diff: 106 lines (+40/-18)2 files modifiedbzrlib/tests/test_selftest.py (+38/-18)
doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.5.txt (+2/-0)
lp:~gz/bzr/2.4_tests_testtools_output_815423
- Vincent Ladeuil: Approve
-
Diff: 82 lines (+19/-9)2 files modifiedbzrlib/tests/test_selftest.py (+16/-9)
doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.4.txt (+3/-0)
Changed in bzr: | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
milestone: | none → 2.5b1 |
Changed in bzr: | |
assignee: | nobody → Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) |
description: | updated |
summary: |
- relies on specific output from python-subunit + Old testtools output expected in test_selftest tests |
To post a comment you must log in.
This isn't down to a subunit change, but a testtools one, that was in response to complaints from bzr such as bug 660852 about the legibility of the output. So, I think these are useful failures from the bzrlib test suite that give some indication of what still needs improving, even if the immediate response is just to make the expected output patterns more liberal.