doesn't display body for some GPG-signed emails
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
evolution (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Newer versions of evolution have stopped displaying the body for some emails that are GPG-signed. Here is an example of the source of such a problematic email:
Return-Path: <email address hidden>
Received: from lists.samba.org (fn.samba.org [216.83.154.106]) by
mxdrop150.
<email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:11:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from
<email address hidden>)
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix) id CA5F1AC287; Mon, 18 Jul 2011
06:11:37 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-To: <email address hidden>
Received: from adelie.
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7A8AC336 for
<email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:11:29 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from loganberry.
adelie.
for <email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:26 +0000
Received: from loganberry.
loganberry.
<email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:26 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Launchpad-
X-Launchpad-
X-Launchpad-Branch: ~baztian/
In-Reply-To: <email address hidden>
Reply-To: <email address hidden>
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
X-Launchpad-
To: <email address hidden>
From: John A Meinel <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: [Merge] lp:~baztian/bzr/809901-filter into lp:bzr
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:26 -0000
Sender: <email address hidden>
Errors-To: <email address hidden>
Precedence: bulk
X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="13405";
Instance=
X-Launchpad-Hash: dd9b49a01fb2ca7
X-XS4ALL-
DNS blacklists
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=0zc6fmG9YcuP
sm=0 a=bf2lbYCmWCMA:10 a=V5BiAS5A5MUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
a=obc2vuLeljtJ
a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=T7S0KEHCzfaTa
a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=obc2vuLeljtJ8
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-XS4ALL-
X-XS4ALL-Spam: NO
Envelope-To: <email address hidden>
Content-
X-MIME-
id p6ICBbGm053346
X-Evolution-Source: imap://<email address hidden>:993/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7/14/2011 8:56 AM, Bastian wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> the tes fails without the change. I've now pushed a proper news entry.
>
> Bastian
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> That looks plausible to me, though I'd like a second review.
>>
>> Does this test fail without the change to sets applied?
>>
>> There ought to be a news entry saying the bug was fixed.
>>
>> --
>> https:/
>> You are the owner of lp:~baztian/bzr/809901-filter.
>>
>
I'm a little concerned about the memory consumption of lots of sets. A
single set with more than 6 items in it becomes ~500 bytes.
I'm curious if it would be better to leave it as a list, and then just
put it into a set later before we iterate over it. (Then you only really
have 1 set at a time, rather than one for each path.)
We can always wait and see if this becomes a memory issue or not.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk4
B68AoJ2FAFcfX9n
=rj6S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
https:/
You are reviewing the proposed merge of lp:~baztian/bzr/809901-filter into lp:bzr.
Confirming, some (I'd almost venture to say *most*) signed messages don't get rendered correctly, although they are indeed being loaded and saved correctly (which you can confirm by saving as mbox).