load average graph scaling is misleading
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
System Load Indicator |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Michael Hofmann |
Bug Description
The minimum value currently in place for indicator-
I (and probably others using this indicator) am used to the way gnome-applets scales it. They actually have a hard maximum of '5' set, which seems to work rather well: http://
I suspect the "correct" solution would be to set the minimum to the number of logical CPUs or something. On a 12-core hyperthreaded machine (i.e. 24 thread), a load average of '0.25' is *nothing*, and the indicator should reflect that. However, on a single-core, single-thread machine, a load of 0.25 might be indicative of something impacting user-noticeable performance.
Changed in indicator-multiload: | |
assignee: | nobody → Michael Hofmann (mh21) |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
Changed in indicator-multiload: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Sounds good. A minimum corresponding to the number of cores, but what about the maximum? Would it still make sense to automatically scale the graph per default (there will be an option to configure the scaling to your liking in dconf eventually)?