Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1

Bug #800224 reported by Benjamin Drung
18
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Lucid Backports
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
Natty Backports
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
maverick-backports
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1 to natty, maverick, and lucid. It builds without modifications and installs.

Benjamin Drung (bdrung)
Changed in natty-backports:
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in maverick-backports:
status: New → Confirmed
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Benjamin Drung (bdrung) wrote :

Here's the debdiff for lucid.

Changed in lucid-backports:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

Also needs confirmation it works (runs).

Changed in lucid-backports:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Changed in maverick-backports:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Changed in natty-backports:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

Forgot this is a metapackage. "Running" it is a bit of a no-op. Approved by ubuntu-backporters.

Changed in lucid-backports:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: Incomplete → In Progress
Changed in maverick-backports:
status: Incomplete → In Progress
Changed in natty-backports:
status: Incomplete → In Progress
Changed in maverick-backports:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Changed in natty-backports:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote :

If it's intended to have this backported all the way to lucid, is there any reason the oneiric version requires debhelper 8? If you just relaxed that, we could do no-change backports, instead of special-casing lucid. I can't imagine you need any fancy new debhelper features to build a metapackage. :P

Revision history for this message
Benjamin Drung (bdrung) wrote :

When I created the metapackage, I didn't tough about backporting it to lucid.

Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote : Re: [Bug 800224] Re: Please backport packaging-dev 0.1

Which is why it's good not to over-specify version requirements.

Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote : Re: Please backport packaging-dev 0.1

(That was my subtle way of saying "upload a new version to oneiric that builds correctly with more versions of debhelper, and I'll be happy to backport that instead".

Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote :

Erm, and I just realised you were maintaining it in Debian, not Ubuntu, so... Same argument, but make it work with versions of debhelper going back to 7.0.15 (lenny's version), and update it in sid, and I'll sync and backport it? ;)

(Okay, so the lenny requirement is just nitpicking on my part, but may as well, right?)

Revision history for this message
Benjamin Drung (bdrung) wrote :

I downgraded the debhelper dependency to the lowest needed one (7.0.50~ for dh_override_* targets) and uploaded it as version 0.1.1. Please backport that.

summary: - Please backport packaging-dev 0.1
+ Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote :

I: Extracting packaging-dev_0.1.1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of packaging-dev as 0.1.1~lucid1 ... done.

Changed in lucid-backports:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote :

I: Extracting packaging-dev_0.1.1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of packaging-dev as 0.1.1~maverick1 ... done.

Changed in maverick-backports:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote :

I: Extracting packaging-dev_0.1.1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of packaging-dev as 0.1.1~natty1 ... done.

Changed in natty-backports:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.