Critically improved Dutch translation available upstream

[Pjotr12345]

I'm a member of the Dutch Translation Team for Xfce (upstream). All Dutch translations for xfce-4.8 have been critically improved, including the Dutch translation for the garcon package.

Because of the major improvements in the Dutch translations of garcon, I would very much appreciate it if they would be included in the updates for the current stable Xubuntu (11.04).

[Pjotr12345 (computertip)]

I've added the Dutch translation of this package, to this message.

For your information: this particular approach (filing a bug report for each package that has a new Dutch translation) was chosen in consultation with the Xubuntu Team (Lionel Le Folgoc, aka mr_pouit).

[Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)]

Fixed in oneiric; opening a natty task if someone wants to fix that.

[Benjamin Kerensa (bkerensa)]

Requesting this report be set to wishlist.

[Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)]

> Requesting this report be set to wishlist.

Why? Are you able to read Dutch (fwiw, I can't), and you compared the new and old translations and so can tell that there are only not-so-important changes? (in which case it's probably not really suitable for sru and should be closed instead and not set as wishlist)
Or you just wrote a random comment on a random bug report?

[Benjamin Kerensa (bkerensa)]

@Lionel Le Folgoc:

Is there some defect or bug in the translation? If its just a improved translation should it not be appropriately sent to the Translations Team versus a bug report?

The following link provides information on when a bug report should be filed regarding a translation and based by the original reporters summary it seems this was filed erroneously:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Filing%20translation%20bugs

[Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)]

This documentation doesn't apply in this case, because Xfce translations aren't redone in launchpad, we directly take the upstream ones. The original reporter is already one of the Xfce translators, so no need to send it to him. I told him to file the bugs this way. So it's fine as it is, thanks.

(Sorry if I was a bit harsh, but I'm getting tired of this documentation which is often wrong for various reasons, e.g. because it focuses on main packages, and xfce is in universe... It should be explicitly added to it: "do not follow blindly this broken doc and ask more experienced bug triagers, or the team responsible for this package set, e.g. ask charlie-tca for xubuntu ;-)")