Bindwood should support tags

[Ted Gould]

It seems that bindwood doesn't put the tags into CouchDB. It should. They're useful!

[Ted Gould (ted)]

On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 14:16 +0000, John O'Brien wrote:
> ** Changed in: bindwood
> Status: New => Won't Fix

Just to be curious, why?

[dobey (dobey)]

Ted, we stopped supporting bindwood and bookmarks sync:

http://voices.canonical.com/ubuntuone/2011/10/17/putting-bookmark-sync-to-bed/

[John Lenton (chipaca)]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:15:32 -0000, Ted Gould <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 14:16 +0000, John O'Brien wrote:
> > ** Changed in: bindwood
> > Status: New => Won't Fix
>
> Just to be curious, why?

bindwood is unsupported, up for adoption if you want it :)

[Ted Gould (ted)]

On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:48 +0000, John Lenton wrote:
> bindwood is unsupported, up for adoption if you want it :)

Hmm, I thought that the blog post meant "we're not going to fix it now,
but we'll update to the new data API when we have it." I figured this
meant that bindwood was in a coma not that it was dead :-)

Still, seems odd to make all the bugs "Won't Fix". What ever, I'd love
it if it worked, seems like a useful feature to me, but I certainly
don't have time to maintain it.