[i915gm] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x7d990000)

[mkis62]

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel

seems to be a duplicate of #738712... anyway, it's back!
Crashed while printing a *.pdf from evince

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Chipset: i915gm
Date: Mon Apr 4 19:00:19 2011
DistroCodename: natty
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DuplicateSignature: (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x7d990000)
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
MachineType: Acer TravelMate 2410
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py
ProcEnviron:

ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=UUID=263aecd1-0156-49f9-8d5e-99e8079b240f ro gfxpayload=true quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu1
 libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6
 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu6
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Title: [i915gm] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x7d990000)
UdevDb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-01-03 (91 days ago)
UserGroups:

dmi.bios.date: 02/07/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD
dmi.bios.version: V1.09
dmi.board.name: Morar
dmi.board.vendor: Acer
dmi.board.version: Rev
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: None
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvrV1.09:bd02/07/2006:svnAcer:pnTravelMate2410:pvr0100:rvnAcer:rnMorar:rvrRev:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: TravelMate 2410
dmi.product.version: 0100
dmi.sys.vendor: Acer
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.1-0ubuntu3
version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu1

[Apport retracing service (apport)]

This crash has the same stack trace characteristics as bug #738712. However, the latter was already fixed in an earlier package version than the one in this report. This might be a regression or because the problem is in a dependent package.