compiz crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()

Bug #745627 reported by Conor Curran
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nux (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Did a fresh beta install (daily build from yesterday which apparently is the rc) and everything was fine until I tried to open any application at which point compiz kept crashing.
I was using a dual monitor setup.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: libnux-0.9-0 0.9.36-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Mar 30 12:37:29 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
ProcCmdline: compiz
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: nux
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
 abort () at abort.c:92
 g_assertion_message (domain=0x6896e6 "GLib", file=0x6d17f0 "/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./glib/gvarianttypeinfo.c", line=186, func=0x6d1a70 "g_variant_type_info_check", message=<value optimised out>) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./glib/gtestutils.c:1358
 g_assertion_message_expr (domain=0x6896e6 "GLib", file=0x6d17f0 "/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./glib/gvarianttypeinfo.c", line=186, func=0x6d1a70 "g_variant_type_info_check", expr=0x6d17b9 "0 <= index && index < 24") at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./glib/gtestutils.c:1369
Title: compiz crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-01-04 (84 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Conor Curran (cjcurran) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #743598, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.