aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _set_status_details(): 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe4 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)

Bug #742577 reported by cakowh
22
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: aptdaemon

aaaaaaaaaaa

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.41+bzr604-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.38-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Mar 25 23:45:50 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/aptd
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha i386 (20110323)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/sbin/aptd
ProcEnviron:

PythonArgs: ['/usr/sbin/aptd']
SourcePackage: aptdaemon
Title: aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _set_status_details(): 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe4 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
cakowh (2602122-qq) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

security vulnerability: yes → no
visibility: private → public
Robert Roth (evfool)
Changed in aptdaemon (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #724735, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.