e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #737370 reported by Woodbj
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #727370: Contacts not syncing with my computer. Edit Remove
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
evolution-data-server (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: evolution-data-server

-

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: evolution-data-server 2.32.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-6.34-generic-pae 2.6.38-rc7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-6-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Fri Mar 18 18:39:05 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LC_MESSAGES=en_AU.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb68f5266: movl $0xffffffff,0x4(%eax)
 PC (0xb68f5266) ok
 source "$0xffffffff" ok
 destination "0x4(%eax)" (0x00000004) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
Title: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-02 (15 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Woodbj (woodbj)
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #720531, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.