e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #735903 reported by Curtis Hovey
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #727370: Contacts not syncing with my computer. Edit Remove
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
evolution-data-server (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: evolution-data-server

My previous reports of e-addressbook craches were about the couchdb addressbooks. I know have none. I cannot see or search them. The data is there and autocomplete works.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: evolution-data-server 2.32.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-6.34-generic 2.6.38-rc7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-6-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Mar 16 00:02:42 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x6511266: movl $0xffffffff,0x4(%eax)
 PC (0x06511266) ok
 source "$0xffffffff" ok
 destination "0x4(%eax)" (0x00000004) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
Title: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2010-12-27 (78 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #720531, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.