ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in get_interfaces_for_object(): No module named Dee

Bug #731506 reported by Andy Whitcroft
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client

?

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: ubuntuone-client 1.5.5-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-6.33~pre1-generic 2.6.38-rc7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-6-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Mar 8 18:14:57 2011
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone-syncdaemon
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/lib/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone-syncdaemon
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
PythonArgs: ['/usr/lib/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone-syncdaemon']
SourcePackage: ubuntuone-client
Title: ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in get_interfaces_for_object(): No module named Dee
UbuntuOnePreferencesLog:
 2010-05-28 17:47:38,976 - ubuntuone-preferences - DEBUG - starting
 2010-05-28 17:47:44,100 - ubuntuone-preferences - DEBUG - got limits: dbus.Dictionary({dbus.String(u'download'): dbus.Int32(2097152), dbus.String(u'upload'): dbus.Int32(2097152)}, signature=dbus.Signature('si'))
UbuntuOneUserSyncdaemonConfig:
 [bandwidth_throttling]
 on = False
 read_limit = 2097152
 write_limit = 2097152
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2010-12-18 (79 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Andy Whitcroft (apw) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #731023, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.