Control another virtualbricks session on a remote host
Bug #691977 reported by
Daniele Lacamera
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtualbricks |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Daniele Lacamera | ||
Bug Description
Virtualbricks should accept TCP connections from another virtualbricks client that want to control all the bricks on it, and the two networks can be joined using a tunnel. This way the cloud can be distributed, extensible and will have centralized control.
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| status: | New → Opinion |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| assignee: | nobody → Danielinux (o-root-danielinux-net) |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| status: | Opinion → In Progress |
| importance: | Wishlist → Low |
Revision history for this message
| Francesco Apollonio (lorddex) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| milestone: | none → 0.3 |
| importance: | Low → Medium |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| assignee: | Danielinux (o-root-danielinux-net) → nobody |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| milestone: | 0.3 → 0.4 |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| milestone: | 0.4 → 0.5 |
Revision history for this message
| Daniele Lacamera (o-root-danielinux-net) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| assignee: | nobody → Danielinux (o-root-danielinux-net) |
Revision history for this message
| Daniele Lacamera (o-root-danielinux-net) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in virtualbrick: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I think that we have to use libssl to create the tunnel between two remote virtualbricks.