Need to test drizzle protocol plugin more thoroughly
Bug #667948 reported by
Patrick Crews
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drizzle |
Invalid
|
Low
|
Patrick Crews | ||
Bug Description
We need to test the drizzle protocol plugin with and without the mysql protocol plugin enabled.
This should include a variety of queries - both DML and DDL.
| Changed in drizzle: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Patrick Crews (patrick-crews) |
Revision history for this message
| Andrew Hutchings (linuxjedi) wrote | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Patrick Crews (patrick-crews) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in drizzle: | |
| status: | New → Invalid |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
| milestone: | none → 2011-01-17 |
To post a comment you must log in.
Should this now be marked as invalid since we no longer have a proper drizzle protocol plugin (it is just a way of adding a separate port for the MySQL protocol)?