Drizzle

In DD we should use MAXIMUM_IDENTIFIER_LENGTH for identifiers (like we do in IS).

Bug #658673 reported by Brian Aker on 2010-10-11

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	Drizzle	Fix Released	Low	Stewart Smith	Drizzle 2011-06-20

In the code IS was written after DD, so it made use of MAXIMUM_IDENTIFIER_LENGTH for identifiers, we should fix this in DD to be the same.

Drizzle Merge Team: Pending requested 2011-06-17

Brian Aker (brianaker) on 2010-10-11

Changed in drizzle:
assignee:	nobody → Brian Aker (brianaker)

Changed in drizzle:
importance:	Undecided → Low

Stewart Smith (stewart) on 2011-06-17

Changed in drizzle:
status:	New → In Progress
assignee:	Brian Aker (brianaker) → Stewart Smith (stewart)

Stewart Smith (stewart) on 2011-06-17

Changed in drizzle:
milestone:	none → 2011-06-20

Stewart Smith (stewart) on 2011-06-17

Changed in drizzle:
status:	In Progress → Fix Committed

Revision history for this message

Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek) wrote on 2011-06-19:

What's the benefit of using MAXIMUM_IDENTIFIER_LENGTH?

Stewart Smith (stewart) on 2011-06-20

Changed in drizzle:
status:	Fix Committed → Fix Released

Revision history for this message

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:12:25 -0000, Olaf van der Spek <email address hidden> wrote:
> What's the benefit of using MAXIMUM_IDENTIFIER_LENGTH?

It's a define rather than a hardcoded number (in this case, often
inherited default).

ensures that identifiers aren't ever truncated in I_S/DD tables.

--
Stewart Smith

This report contains Public information

Everyone can see this information.

You are

Subscribing...

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.