gnome-panel assert failure: gnome-panel: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

Bug #651556 reported by Tosiki Iga
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnome-panel

Just launching FireFox, crash occurred.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gnome-panel 1:2.30.2-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic-pae 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: gnome-panel: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
Date: Wed Sep 29 23:24:15 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
GConfNonDefault:
 /apps/panel/general/applet_id_list=[fast_user_switch_screen0,trashapplet_screen0,workspace_switcher_screen0,window_list_screen0,show_desktop_button_screen0,indicator_applet_screen0,notification_area_screen0,clock_screen0,applet_0]
 /apps/panel/general/object_id_list=[browser_launcher_screen0,menu_bar_screen0]
 /apps/panel/general/toplevel_id_list=[bottom_panel_screen0,top_panel_screen0]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Beta i386 (20100901.1)
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
 _XAllocID () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
Title: gnome-panel assert failure: gnome-panel: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse plugdev tape video

Revision history for this message
Tosiki Iga (tosiki-iga) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #650740, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.