brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_instance_get_private()

Bug #647653 reported by Darren Weslow
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
brasero (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: brasero

Version Ubuntu 10.10 rc3

Package in use :Brasero

Usually brasero opens and no trouble burning a disk

Clicked on the package Brasero and it did not start

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: brasero 2.31.92-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Sep 25 18:50:15 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/brasero
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha amd64 (20100917)
ProcCmdline: brasero /home/username/Desktop/Downloads/aptoncd-20100925-DVD1.iso
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7ffce2c15a31 <g_type_instance_get_private+33>: cmpq $0x0,(%rdi)
 PC (0x7ffce2c15a31) ok
 source "$0x0" ok
 destination "(%rdi)" (0x4c9e3657) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: brasero
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_instance_get_private () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 unique_marshal_ENUM__INT_BOXED_UINT () from /usr/lib/libunique-1.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_instance_get_private()
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare tape video

Revision history for this message
Darren Weslow (dazw2001) wrote :
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #644762, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.