xfce4-xfapplet-plugin assert failure: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

[Th. Sievers]

Binary package hint: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin

at login

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin 0.1.0-3ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-20-generic i686
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
Date: Tue Sep 7 19:06:39 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin socket_id 31457323 name xfapplet id 12835766902 display_name XfApplet size 28 screen_position 11
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_DE.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 *__GI_raise (sig=6)
 *__GI_abort () at abort.c:92
 *__GI___assert_fail (assertion=0xccc4e5 "ret != inval_id",
 _XAllocID (dpy=0x845a250) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:385
Title: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin assert failure: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (xfce4-cpugraph-plugin:1823): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_container_set_border_width: assertion `GTK_IS_CONTAINER (container)' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1879): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed

[Apport retracing service (apport)]

StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 *__GI_raise (sig=6)
 *__GI_abort () at abort.c:92
 *__GI___assert_fail (assertion=0xccc4e5 "ret != inval_id",
 _XAllocID (dpy=0x845a250) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:385

[Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek)]

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 507062, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.