package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1

Bug #630125 reported by Gautham Vignesh
16
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
torque (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: torque-client

Give proper solution for my problem...

Regards,
B.Gautham Vignesh

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: torque-client (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.42-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Sep 4 16:08:54 2010
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429)
SourcePackage: torque
Title: package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1

Revision history for this message
Gautham Vignesh (joystik10) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

security vulnerability: yes → no
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Steffen Möller (moeller-debian) wrote :

The two are in conflict, indeed. The debian package I found to explicitly mention the conflict at least since 2.4.9. Most groups will only have a single queueing system, but, hey, at least during a transition period the installation of both is not unlikely. So, this conflict is truly unfortunate. I do not have any good solution. The alternative system does not apply since this would require the different queues to actually have the same semantics between different queueing system. qsub is also with sge, no? Bug 694572 reports the same problem.

Changed in torque (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
tags: added: package-conflict
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.