avalon-framework copyright invalid format
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
avalon-framework (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
avalon-framework (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
The debian/copyright asserts it is formatted according to the Dep5 proposed standard but is invalid in a couple respects.
Attached a patch (bzr diff on the file) that brings it into conformance with the current draft version (135, see http://
These are the changes:
* Added URL to the version of the draft standard the copyright file
implements
* Changed "License: ..." lines to validly assert Apache-2.0 license (
spaces are not allowed in license names)
* created new free-standing "License: " stanza to hold previously
redundant text that says where to find apache-2.0 license text
* removed line about where pom files were downloaded from. Is this info
required? if so, I am not sure how to add it, perhaps with a new
header starting with "X-", as in "X-Downloaded: ..."
Attached bzr diff is against lp:ubuntu/avalon-framework.
tags: | added: patch |
tags: |
added: patch-forwarded-debian removed: patch |
Changed in avalon-framework (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in avalon-framework (Debian): | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Committed |
Changed in avalon-framework (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
Changed in avalon-framework (Debian): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
The previous patch was in the wrong direction (bzr diff -r9..8 copyright > ../../fix- copyright- formatting) .
Please consider this patch instead (made with bzr diff -r8..9 copyright > ../../fix- copyright- formatting) .