Frozen Bubble's description contains unnecessary details

[Mohamed Amine Ilidrissi]

Binary package hint: frozen-bubble

In Frozen Bubble's description in the Software Center, we find this line: "This game is widely rumored to be responsible for delaying the Woody release."
I think informations related to rumors or Debian-specific should not be present.

The package description also features the Homepage url which should not be there, but in the debian/control Homepage field

[Andrew (and471)]

Forwarded to Debian, I shall work on it there

[Vish (vish)]

Thanks for forwarding to debian.

[Andrew (and471)]

Okay, the fix I have agreed with the debian maintainer is to fix the homepage thing in both debian and ubuntu, but then fix the woody reference in just Ubuntu (as it has no relevance in Ubuntu).

I shall wait until the homepage patch is uploaded in debian and then comes to ubuntu, then add the wood patch, otherwise if debian don't do it before it gets too close to Maverick, do the whole patch for Ubuntu and then remove part of the patch next cycle.

[Andrew (and471)]

OK Debian is being slow again :(

I shall create a merge request for ubuntu with the fix, which hopefully will be removed if Debian applies the debdiff in the future.

[Andrew (and471)]

I have linked the branch that contains the fix as well as improving the already spartan description (approved by vish :D)

Ready for merging :)

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package frozen-bubble - 2.2.0-1ubuntu2

---------------
frozen-bubble (2.2.0-1ubuntu2) maverick; urgency=low

  * debian/control (LP: #599809)
    - Removed homepage reference from description and moved
      it into 'Homepage' field
    - Removed 'woody' reference, removed double mention of
      'Frozen Bubble', added more to description about gameplay
      and included tools
 -- Andrew Higginson <email address hidden> Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:19:47 +0100

[Stefano Rivera (stefanor)]

No need to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors when you have a branch merge proposal. Fix looks good to me.

[Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar)]

On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:25 +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> No need to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors when you have a branch merge
> proposal. Fix looks good to me.
>

See Vish and Andrew. No need to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors when one has a
branch merge proposal.

[Mohamed Amine Ilidrissi (ilidrissi.amine)]

Marking as fix released as the package is fixed.