enum with 65536 elements doesn't work properly

Bug #589497 reported by Stewart Smith
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Drizzle
Fix Released
Medium
Stewart Smith
Dexter
Fix Released
Medium
Stewart Smith

Bug Description

--- /home/stewart/drizzle/working/tests/r/type_enum_max_elements.result 2010-06-04 05:18:43.342569554 +0300
+++ /home/stewart/drizzle/working/tests/r/type_enum_max_elements.reject 2010-06-04 05:21:58.762567118 +0300
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 Level Code Message
 select * from max_enum_values order by many_values;
 many_values
+
 a0
 a65534
-a65535
 DROP TABLE max_enum_values;

(yes, the CREATE TABLE statement is huge)

Related branches

Stewart Smith (stewart)
Changed in drizzle:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Stewart Smith (stewart)
Changed in drizzle:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.