a serious bug in enumerate=false mode

[Timo Aaltonen]

Binary package hint: sssd

from the upstream release notes of 1.0.6:

  * Fix a serious bug when operating in enumerate=false mode
     o This configuration would occasionally result in periods of several minutes where the backend was operating at 100% CPU.

so 1.0.6 fixes this. Needs an SRU to lucid.

[Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)]

the full changelog:

https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.0.6

Jakub Hrozek (2):

    * Do not schedule enumeration after a cleanup
    * Do not check entries during cleanup task

Stephen Gallagher (2):

    * Revert "Change default for enumeration to TRUE"
    * Release version 1.0.6

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package sssd - 1.0.6-0ubuntu1

---------------
sssd (1.0.6-0ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low

  * New upstream bugfix release.
    - Fix a serious bug when operating in enumerate=false mode. This
      configuration would occasionally result in periods of several
      minutes where the backend was operating at 100% CPU. (LP: #585885)
 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Wed, 26 May 2010 17:09:11 +0300

[Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)]

I've uploaded 1.0.6-0ubuntu1~lucid1 to lucid-proposed.

[Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)]

note that this bug was brought to our attention by upstream, and they released 1.0.6 for us (the fix had been already in 1.1.0 released in March 22nd)

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

Accepted sssd into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

Any testers?

[Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)]

Martin, this was uploaded due to upstream alarming us that the current package is broken. It was reported on the upstream irc channel (I think), here's the announce email:

https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2010-May/003775.html

so I don't know if it's possible to find the users who reported this upstream..

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

A confirmation that the current package still works (thus a regression test) would also help a lot.

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

As nobody at all tested this package, I removed it from lucid-proposed again.