Natbib version not compatible with revtex4-1 from texlive-publishers

Bug #578693 reported by janitor048
32
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
texlive-base (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: texlive-base

revtex4-1 included in texlive-publishers (2009-7ubuntu3) does not work with version 8.31 of natbib included in texlive-latex-base (2009-7). It requires the most recent version 8.31a (see http://authors.aps.org/revtex4/).
Latex documents using the documentclass revtex4-1 can therefore not be compiled on Lucid.

Revision history for this message
Andre (ajx) wrote :
Revision history for this message
janitor048 (g-janitor048-googlemail-com) wrote :

Well, of course you can fix this by manually downloading and installing the latest natbib version into a texmf tree of your choice (system-wide or user-based).
But still it remains a bug in ubuntu - there should be no version conflicts in the packages of a LTS version. The fix would certainly be to include natbib 8.31a into texlive-latex-base.

Revision history for this message
Andre (ajx) wrote :

I agree. This needs to be fixed.

Revision history for this message
none (ubuntu-bugs-nullinfinity-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

One workaround is to install texlive-publishers version 2009-9 from Debian Unstable - this package now contains revtex4 in addition to revtex 4.1. Apparently revtex 4.1 is buggy anyway, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561836.

Revision history for this message
Kyle Spyksma (kspyksma) wrote :

Many journals (aps and aip), are requiring the use of revtex4.1, buggy or not, for manuscript submission. Another reason to bput natbib v8.31a into texlive-latex-base.

uellue (dieter-uellue)
Changed in texlive-base (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Juan M Lopez (lopez-s) wrote :

Hasn't been fixed for a year yet. I had to manually update both revtex4-1 to its latest version to get affiliations to work properly AND natbib to compile a paper. A LTS version should not have this problems for so long. Having to manually update latex packages is quite inefficient, one chooses a LTS version for a reason.

Revision history for this message
cluracan (josephsonjunction) wrote :

I also have this problem. Worse - for some reason once in a while (probably during some system update) the natbib is reverted to the older LTS version and I have to reinstall it.

Quite annoying.

Revision history for this message
Ville Bergholm (ville-bergholm) wrote :

Still present in Ubuntu 12.04 due to the antiquated texlive 2009 it uses.

Workaround: Install the backported texlive 2012 from 12.10.
http://askubuntu.com/questions/163682/how-do-i-install-the-latest-tex-live-2012-on-ubuntu-12-04

Revision history for this message
Vikram Jadhao (vikramjadhao) wrote :

The following worked for me. I am on 12.04 LTS.

1. If you have texlive-publishers installed, remove it. (This step is necessary as otherwise it won't let you do step 3).

2. Follow the steps in this link: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9097651&postcount=4

3. Get and install the texlive-publishers package using this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/575812/comments/2

This resolves the affiliation bug. In addition, it also defaults to urls not being displayed with the bibtex in the references.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.