hostname package marked for suppression but is essential

Bug #572917 reported by LeForgeron
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
update-manager (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: update-manager

An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade:
Le paquet essentiel « hostname » est marqué pour suppression.

 This can be caused by:
 * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
 * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu
 * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu

Si rien de ceci ne convient, veuillez signaler ce bogue concernant le paquet « update-manager » en y joignant les fichiers du dossier /var/log/dist-upgrade/.

From apt.log (attached):
Investigating hostname
Package hostname has broken Pré-Dépend on upstart-job
  Considering upstart 19414 as a solution to hostname 5103
  Removing hostname rather than change upstart-job

main.log extract (look at the end):
2010-05-01 11:25:11,736 DEBUG needServerMode(): can not find a desktop meta package or key deps, running in server mode
2010-05-01 11:28:36,718 DEBUG Installing 'xserver-xorg-video-all' (Distro KeepInstalledPkgs rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:40,218 DEBUG Running KeepInstalledSection rules
2010-05-01 11:28:41,873 DEBUG Kernel uname: '2.6.31-21-generic'
2010-05-01 11:28:42,290 DEBUG ./get_kernel_list.sh returns: ['linux-generic', 'linux-image-generic', 'linux-server', 'linux-image-server', 'linux-virtual', 'linux-image-virtual', 'linux-xen', 'linux-image-xen', 'linux-preempt', 'linux-image-preempt', 'linux-rt', 'linux-image-rt']
2010-05-01 11:28:42,290 DEBUG linux-image-generic kernel already installed
2010-05-01 11:28:42,291 DEBUG Upgrading 'linux-image-generic' (Upgrading kernel from base-installer)
2010-05-01 11:28:42,477 DEBUG nvidiaUpdate()
2010-05-01 11:28:42,676 INFO no old nvidia driver installed, installing no new
2010-05-01 11:28:42,677 DEBUG Upgrading 'brasero' (Distro PostUpgradeUpgrade rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,780 DEBUG Removing 'libflashsupport' (Distro PostUpgradeRemove rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,783 DEBUG Removing 'kvm-source' (Distro PostUpgradeRemove rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,783 DEBUG Removing 'gtk-qt-engine' (Distro PostUpgradeRemove rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,783 DEBUG Removing 'libparted1.8-12' (Distro PostUpgradeRemove rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,827 DEBUG Removing 'usplash' (Distro PostUpgradeRemove rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,870 DEBUG Purging 'ltsp-client' (Distro PostUpgradePurge rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,921 DEBUG Purging 'ltspfsd' (Distro PostUpgradePurge rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,963 DEBUG Purging 'linux-restricted-modules-common' (Distro PostUpgradePurge rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:43,963 DEBUG plugins for condition 'PostDistUpgradeCache' are '[]'
2010-05-01 11:28:43,963 DEBUG plugins for condition 'lucidPostDistUpgradeCache' are '[]'
2010-05-01 11:28:43,964 DEBUG plugins for condition 'from_karmicPostDistUpgradeCache' are '[]'
2010-05-01 11:28:43,964 DEBUG Installing 'ubuntu-minimal' (base meta package keep installed rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:44,526 DEBUG Installing 'ubuntu-standard' (base meta package keep installed rule)
2010-05-01 11:28:45,966 DEBUG The package 'hostname' is marked for removal but it's a ESSENTIAL package
2010-05-01 11:53:22,450 ERROR Dist-upgrade failed: 'Le paquet essentiel « hostname » est marqué pour suppression.'
2010-05-01 11:53:22,450 DEBUG abort called

Tags: karmic2lucid
Revision history for this message
LeForgeron (jgrimbert) wrote :
Revision history for this message
LeForgeron (jgrimbert) wrote :

Forget to say: I'm trying to upgrade from 9.10 to 10.4

Revision history for this message
Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) wrote :

Thanks for your report.

Could you please attach the file /var/lib/dpkg/status to this report. Thanks.

tags: added: karmic2lucid
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
LeForgeron (jgrimbert) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) wrote :

thanks for the file. setting to confirmed since you provided the required information.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
LeForgeron (jgrimbert) wrote :

This bug can be closed/dismissed.

Upgrade has been done successfully.
On the action that might have helped:
 - removing all external sources (doubtful)
 - removing opera package
 - removing usplash-themes
 - removing x-video-server-all (spelling/name ?) package

Revision history for this message
Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) wrote :

Thanks for the update.
I've not seen any duplicate either. This should be specific to your system setup. I'm closing this report then.

Don't hesitate to submit any new bug.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.