rebuild against xulrunner-1.9.2

[Rolf Leggewie]

Binary package hint: eclipse

please rebuild eclipse (and a number of other packages currently using xulrunner-1.9.1) against the newer xulrunner-1.9.2.

[Axel Beckert (xtaran)]

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:51:03AM -0000, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> ** Affects: conkeror (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New

This is already fixed in the repo[1] and will be uploaded to Debian
unstable soon, i.e. with the next upload. I run Conkeror snapshots
with the preview release of Debian's xulrunner-1.9.2 since its release
without problems.

  [1] http://repo.or.cz/w/conkeror.git/commitdiff/cbc2e88fe750160adad66d8f8648493856e78c88

And since the conkeror wrapper in /usr/bin/conkeror works fine again
with Ubuntu's xulrunner[2], too, since January, you should be able to
use the unmodified Debian package.

  [2] http://repo.or.cz/w/conkeror.git/commitdiff/cbc2e88fe750160adad66d8f8648493856e78c88

I would really appreciate it, if a version including those two commits
would be included in Lucid.

  Regards, Axel (Debian maintainer of conkeror)
--
 ,''`. | Axel Beckert <email address hidden>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5

[Chris Halse Rogers (raof)]

 affects ubuntu/gjs
 assign raof
 status inprogress

This is blocked on an i386 & armel FTBFS; I'm investigating.

[Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)]

There wasn't really any need to open a bug report like that with all those tasks - we're already well aware of the packages which need rebuilding and already working through them

[Micah Gersten (micahg)]

I'm closing all the bug tasks in this bug as this just creates a lot of bug noise for everyone. We're opening individual bugs against each package as we port them.

You can follow this wiki page for overall progress:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/xulrunner-list