Option to always tick "Someone should review this translation"
Bug #525992 reported by
Adi Roiban
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Launchpad itself |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Adi Roiban |
Bug Description
Member of translations teams are double agents and this is not an easy job :)
They can act as translators or as reviewers .... but if they try to act as humble translators LP just makes their life miserable as they will always have to check the "Someone should review this translation" checkbox.
Maybe we can add an option for "reviewers" to allow them to tell LP they are in "translators mode" and all "Someone should review this translation" checkboxes should be checked by default.
This can be done on clientside using a cookie and javascript.
The checkbox should be checked by default, but the reviewer could manually uncheck it.
Related branches
lp:~adiroiban/launchpad/bug-525992
- Henning Eggers (community): Approve (code)
- Matthew Revell (community): Approve (documentation)
- Michael Nelson (community): Approve (ui)
- Paul Hummer (community): Approve (ui*)
-
Diff: 461 lines (+290/-17)9 files modifiedlib/lp/translations/help/imported-upload.html (+5/-5)
lib/lp/translations/help/permissions-policies.html (+5/-5)
lib/lp/translations/help/working-modes.html (+56/-0)
lib/lp/translations/javascript/pofile.js (+77/-1)
lib/lp/translations/stories/standalone/xx-pofile-translate.txt (+6/-2)
lib/lp/translations/stories/standalone/xx-translation-access-display.txt (+34/-1)
lib/lp/translations/stories/standalone/xx-translationmessage-translate.txt (+7/-3)
lib/lp/translations/templates/translations-macros.pt (+11/-0)
lib/lp/translations/windmill/tests/test_pofile_translate.py (+89/-0)
Changed in rosetta: | |
assignee: | nobody → Adi Roiban (adiroiban) |
Changed in rosetta: | |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
tags: |
added: qa-ok removed: qa-needstesting |
Changed in rosetta: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I've also always thought these would be a useful feature, but I had never figured out how this could be implemented. This is just a comment to say that I also think it's a good idea :)