gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables()

Bug #521459 reported by Mario Limonciello
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gvfs

When starting up ubiquity.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Feb 13 18:27:18 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor
LiveMediaBuild: Mythbuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100213)
Package: gvfs 1.5.3-0ubuntu2
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-13.18-generic
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xa6280a <gdu_pool_get_presentables+26>: mov 0xc(%eax),%eax
 PC (0x00a6280a) ok
 source "0xc(%eax)" (0x0000000c) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 gdu_pool_get_presentables () from /usr/lib/libgdu.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_object_newv () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables()
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-13-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #518267, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
Revision history for this message
Mario Limonciello (superm1) wrote :

unmarking duplicate. that bug was marked as fixed in 9.10, and this is showing up in 10.04

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.