some updates to sqliteman for lucid and karmic

[Rolf Leggewie]

Binary package hint: sqliteman

Dave and I are still working on maintaining sqliteman. Here are a few changes for lucid and in a second step karmic (SRU). I think they should be safe enough to not face any difficulties going in.

Please sponsor the lucid.debdiff first. After that, I plan to ask for an SRU for karmic.debdiff.

[Ilya Barygin (randomaction)]

Thank you, uploaded to Lucid. By the way, the package is not lintian-clean, and Maintainer field is not up-to-date (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField). You don't need to do a special upload for this, but it would be appreciated if this were fixed in one of the future uploads.

[Rolf Leggewie (r0lf)]

Ilya, thank you for the quick upload. Subscribing motu-sru. I don't think I need to write a long sermon about http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38707150/karmic.debdiff or do I? The package was obviously misspelt and the fix is so simple and obvious, regression potential is =, I'd say.

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

Fixed in lucid

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

I don't think this warrants an SRU. First of all, it's unusual for an application package to recommend its -doc, and second not doing so is not a big problem, as you can install it manually just fine (which you would/need to do with any other package as well).

The tiny potential benefit doesn't warrant an SRU risk IMHO.