revision emails should omit irrelevant merge proposals

Bug #504356 reported by Aaron Bentley
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Fix Released
Medium
Tim Penhey

Bug Description

Revision emails mention old merge proposals that are no longer relevant, and this can be distracting.

On the other hand, it's hard to determine what "relevant" means. It has been proposed that only the most recent merge proposal is relevant, but older proposals could be relevant if they indicate problems with the latest merge proposal or the code review process. For example, if a branch had been rejected as a bad idea, and then later merged.

Perhaps we should simply hide superseded proposals?

Related branches

Tim Penhey (thumper)
tags: added: email
Changed in launchpad-code:
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Medium
Tim Penhey (thumper)
tags: added: trivial
Tim Penhey (thumper)
Changed in launchpad-code:
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
Tim Penhey (thumper)
Changed in launchpad-code:
milestone: none → 10.02
Tim Penhey (thumper)
Changed in launchpad-code:
assignee: nobody → Tim Penhey (thumper)
Tim Penhey (thumper)
Changed in launchpad-code:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.