[Karmic] Cannot mount SD cards on EEEPC 901

Bug #501861 reported by gianfilippo
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

When trying to insert an SD card in a EEEPC 901, the SD card is not mounted and dmesg is flooded with the following messages:
[ 859.440183] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 861.364217] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 863.284209] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 865.208190] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 867.133202] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 869.068189] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 870.996198] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 872.917122] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 874.852225] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 876.776217] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 878.705200] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 880.629172] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
[ 882.560243] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled

This happens with Ubuntu Karmic - Netbook Remix. The same SD card is successfully read by another ubuntu hardy machine.
Some data:
# uname -a
Linux shadow 2.6.31-16-generic #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 04:01:29 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux

# lsusb
Unknown line at line 10435
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04f2:b071 Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd 2.0M UVC WebCam / CNF7129
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub

# mount
/dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw)
none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw)
none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw)
udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620)
none on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev)
none on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755)
none on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
none on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755)
/dev/sdb1 on /home type ext3 (rw)
binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/gianfi/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=gianfi)

lshw is attached.
Thanks for your help.

Revision history for this message
gianfilippo (gianfi) wrote :
Revision history for this message
David Tombs (dgtombs) wrote :

Sounds like a kernel bug.

affects: ubuntu → linux (Ubuntu)
Andy Whitcroft (apw)
tags: added: kernel-series-unknown
Revision history for this message
David Tombs (dgtombs) wrote :

Andy: the bug description states that it's kernel 2.6.31-16-generic, running on karmic.

tags: added: karmic
removed: kernel-series-unknown
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote :

Hi gianfilippo,

This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ .

If it remains an issue, could you run the following command from a Terminal (Applications->Accessories->Terminal). It will automatically gather and attach updated debug information to this report.

apport-collect -p linux 501861

Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-testing' tag. This can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag located at the bottom of the bug description and deleting the 'needs-upstream-testing' text. Please let us know your results.

Thanks in advance.

    [This is an automated message. Apologies if it has reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

tags: added: needs-kernel-logs
tags: added: needs-upstream-testing
tags: added: kj-triage
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote :

This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed. Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . Also, please be sure to provide any requested information that may have been missing. To reopen the bug, click on the current status under the Status column and change the status back to "New". Thanks.

[This is an automated message. Apologies if it has reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

tags: added: kj-expired
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
Revision history for this message
gianfilippo (gianfi) wrote :

I'm sorry I have the same bugs on my EeePC 901 on Ubuntu 10.04. SD Memories are not mounted and i get the following messages in syslog:
May 25 15:22:37 shadow kernel: [ 2934.844138] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:39 shadow kernel: [ 2936.801090] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:41 shadow kernel: [ 2938.745131] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:43 shadow kernel: [ 2940.672117] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:44 shadow kernel: [ 2942.096304] Monitor-Mwait will be used to enter C-3 state
May 25 15:22:44 shadow kernel: [ 2942.601444] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:46 shadow kernel: [ 2944.536128] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:48 shadow kernel: [ 2946.457152] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:50 shadow kernel: [ 2948.380118] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:52 shadow kernel: [ 2950.304144] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:54 shadow kernel: [ 2952.228138] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:56 shadow kernel: [ 2954.160113] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:22:58 shadow kernel: [ 2956.144189] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:00 shadow kernel: [ 2958.065141] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:02 shadow kernel: [ 2960.028100] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:04 shadow kernel: [ 2961.677870] ===>rt_ioctl_giwscan. 28(28) BSS returned, data->length = 4108
May 25 15:23:04 shadow kernel: [ 2961.956118] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:06 shadow kernel: [ 2963.876274] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:08 shadow kernel: [ 2965.804114] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:10 shadow kernel: [ 2967.732169] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:11 shadow kernel: [ 2969.653168] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled
May 25 15:23:13 shadow kernel: [ 2971.592164] hub 1-0:1.0: connect-debounce failed, port 5 disabled

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Expired → New
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote :

gianfilippo,
    please review my earlier request for information and provide the data requested. Otherwise i will be closing this bug again.

Thanks!

~JFo

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.