guiv3.py crashed with IndexError in AutoReload()

Bug #468073 reported by ex001
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
playonlinux (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: playonlinux

try to install microsoft office, but function.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Oct 30 20:17:05 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/playonlinux/python/guiv3.py
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
Package: playonlinux 3.6-1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: python /usr/share/playonlinux/python/guiv3.py None None
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/playonlinux/python/guiv3.py', 'None', 'None']
SourcePackage: playonlinux
Title: guiv3.py crashed with IndexError in AutoReload()
Traceback:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/share/playonlinux/python/guiv3.py", line 362, in AutoReload
     cut = self.fichier[5].replace("\n","")
 IndexError: list index out of range
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
ex001 (quiksilver-ex001) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

security vulnerability: yes → no
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #392513, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.