totem crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_module_use()

Bug #467888 reported by Paul Hooijenga
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
totem (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: totem

Totem crashes just after starting. Running it from the command line gives me just: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
This also happened using jaunty. Back then it also reported something about /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstlibvisual.so (Sorry, I can't remember the exact error mesasge).

Regards,
Paul

paul@paulx4:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 9.10
Release: 9.10
paul@paulx4:~$ apt-cache policy totem
totem:
  Installed: 2.28.1-0ubuntu4
  Candidate: 2.28.1-0ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 2.28.1-0ubuntu4 0
        500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Sun Nov 1 04:44:35 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem
NonfreeKernelModules: vboxnetadp nvidia
Package: totem 2.28.1-0ubuntu4
ProcCmdline: totem /home/username/Desktop/MP3.xspf
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x809bd07: call *0xb0(%eax)
 PC (0x0809bd07) ok
 source "*0xb0(%eax)" ok
 Reason could not be automatically determined.
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: totem
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 g_type_module_use () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 totem_plugins_engine_activate_plugin ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: totem crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_module_use()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare vboxusers

Revision history for this message
Paul Hooijenga (hackedd) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #449123, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.