I think Isomaster should change category.
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
isomaster (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
software-center (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: software-center
*sorry, 'department'*
Isomaster, the iso manipulation tool, would fit best in the 'accessories' department, specially because it has a swiss-knife (tool) icon.
It could even go to 'other' (which I reckon must be a department for apps in a provisional categorisation).
While if there was a 'multimedia' department it could eventually fit there, 'sound & video' really isn't (as I see) the proper department for it.
Regards.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Oct 25 06:29:09 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelMo
Package: software-center 1.0.1
PackageArchitec
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSign
SourcePackage: software-center
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686
XsessionErrors:
(gnome-
(gnome-
(nautilus:1739): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences
(polkit-
(gnome-
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Invalid |
If we look at the [URL=http:// standards. freedesktop. org/menu- spec/latest/ apa.html]freedesktop standards for menu categorization[ /URL], it would fit in 'Development'.
Maybe Software Center's category 'Progamming' should be renamed 'Development' which is a broader term and wouldn't impair the easy finding of an app (it's obvious that the programming tools must be under the development category).