update-manager in Ubuntu 9.04 doesn't check for duplicated entries in sources.list

Bug #449925 reported by Sergio Costas
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
update-manager (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: update-manager

I updated my system from Ubuntu 9.4 to 9.10 using update-manager. Due to several reasons (explained below) I had some karmic entries in my /etc/apt/sources.list, using pinning to manage the priorities. When I updated to 9.10, update-manager didn't remove that entries, so I had some little troubles after updating, until I removed them.

The reason to put it is that my laptop has problems with the ACPI table, and ACPI didn't work with 9.04. But kernel from 9.10 has a workaround for it, so I pinned that kernel in my 9.04.

The big problem is that I posted that solution at LinLap, http://www.linlap.com/wiki/asus+f5gl , so when the new Ubuntu come out, there will be more users with this problem. So I think that update-manager should check for duplicated entries in sources.list and remove them automagically when doing a dist-upgrade.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 13 00:18:06 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: update-manager 1:0.126
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8
 LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.42-generic
SourcePackage: update-manager
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic i686

Revision history for this message
Sergio Costas (rastersoft-gmail) wrote :
Revision history for this message
to be removed (liw) wrote :

Exact duplicates should actually not matter. Could you attach the sources.list with the problematic entries to this bug report?

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Sergio Costas (rastersoft-gmail) wrote :

Here it is, both the sources.list (the duplicates entries are the first and the last ones), and the preferences, for pinning (in this last, I think the installer should assign the priority of the old operating system to the new one if lower, and delete the old one).

Revision history for this message
Sergio Costas (rastersoft-gmail) wrote :

This is the preferences file (launchpad only accepts one file per comment)

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for update-manager (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.