thunderbird crashes when a new mail incomes during calendar updating

[bi-abba]

Binary package hint: thunderbird

It crashes when I make a "save calendar modification", during mail downloading.
It happens very often, so I hope You can reproduce it.
Thanks.
---
After it crashes I see on console: Segmentation fault

And when I launch it again:

kfmclient(5941) ClientApp::doIt: Creating ClientApp
Launched ok, pid = 5945

I hope this may helps.
---
Package: thunderbird
Priority: optional
Section: mail
Installed-Size: 32464
Maintainer: Alexander Sack <email address hidden>
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
Replaces: mozilla-thunderbird
---
Description: Ubuntu 9.04
Release: 9.04
---
thunderbird:
  Installato: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
  Candidato: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
  Tabella versione:
 *** 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages
        500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
---

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Dependencies:

DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
NonfreeKernelModules: vmmon
Package: mozilla-thunderbird None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-thunderbird.list]
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: thunderbird
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic i686
UnreportableReason: This is not a genuine Ubuntu package

[Alexander Sack (asac)]

did you install the calendar extension from the web? please uinstall that and try the lighting-extension package we provide.

[bi-abba (l-epa-m-inonda)]

Hi.
I upgraded Thunderbird with the package of kubuntu distribution (8.10 -> 9.04); of course I've added some other extensions from web, but with this release of Thunderbird, it seems as the lightning extension comes natively and can only be actived or de-actived, but not removed (or it's impossible on my upgraded package...).
Do You think it's a bug from "upgrade"?
Thanks a lot.
Cheers.

[John Vivirito (gnomefreak)]

Lightning does NOT come installed in thunderbird nor in Ubuntu by default you have added it at one point and kept profile left over. Please post the output of the following:

apt-cache policy lightning-extension libstdc++6 libstdc++5 thunderbird-2.0 thunderbird-3.0

 did you download thunderbird-3.0 from mozilla site. also did you install lightning from mozilla site?

[bi-abba (l-epa-m-inonda)]

Sorry John. I think You're right.
But now it doesn't let me uninstall it...
Here the info You required:

apt-cache policy lightning-extension libstdc++6 libstdc++5 thunderbird-2.0 thunderbird-3.0
lightning-extension:
  Installato: 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
  Candidato: 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
  Tabella versione:
 *** 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libstdc++6:
  Installato: 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
  Candidato: 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
  Tabella versione:
 *** 4.3.3-5ubuntu4 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libstdc++5:
  Installato: (nessuno)
  Candidato: 1:3.3.6-17ubuntu1
  Tabella versione:
     1:3.3.6-17ubuntu1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
W: Impossibile trovare il pacchetto thunderbird-2.0
W: Impossibile trovare il pacchetto thunderbird-3.0

And:

apt-cache policy lightning-extension libstdc++6 libstdc++5 thunderbird
lightning-extension:
  Installato: 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
  Candidato: 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
  Tabella versione:
 *** 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libstdc++6:
  Installato: 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
  Candidato: 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
  Tabella versione:
 *** 4.3.3-5ubuntu4 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libstdc++5:
  Installato: (nessuno)
  Candidato: 1:3.3.6-17ubuntu1
  Tabella versione:
     1:3.3.6-17ubuntu1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
thunderbird:
  Installato: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
  Candidato: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
  Tabella versione:
 *** 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages
        500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages

[bi-abba (l-epa-m-inonda)]

Hi John.
I've tried to force upgrade of lightning into extension manager of thunderbird.
It says me that lightning isn't upgradable, because installation is onto a read-only file system, but it isn't!
The user owner of that directory, has all permissions. Only group and others have r+x as permissions.

Do You think this may helps?
Thanks.
Cheers.

[John Vivirito (gnomefreak)]

Please remove the current profile and start it and see if it helps

[bi-abba (l-epa-m-inonda)]

In this way I'll lost all data?
If yes, there's another way?
Thanks.
Cheers.

[John Vivirito (gnomefreak)]

On 10/07/2009 09:02 AM, bi-abba wrote:
> In this way I'll lost all data?
> If yes, there's another way?
> Thanks.
> Cheers.
>
than try renaming the profile and starting up the app and add
one email address to it see if it helps

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[bi-abba (l-epa-m-inonda)]

Hi John.
I've tryed what You suggests, but:
- again lightning isn't removable, only deactivable
- the new profile takes with itself lightning as I said You

Attached what happened after profile substitution:

~/.mozilla-thunderbird$ Registering Enigmail account manager extension.
Enigmail account manager extension registered.
**** Upgrading calCalendarManager schema to 9/10
**** Upgrading schema from 6/7/8/9 -> 10

~/.mozilla-thunderbird$ apt-cache policy lightning-extension libstdc++6 libstdc++5 thunderbird
lightning-extension:
  Installato: 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
  Candidato: 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
  Tabella versione:
 *** 0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libstdc++6:
  Installato: 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
  Candidato: 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
  Tabella versione:
 *** 4.3.3-5ubuntu4 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libstdc++5:
  Installato: (nessuno)
  Candidato: 1:3.3.6-17ubuntu1
  Tabella versione:
     1:3.3.6-17ubuntu1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
thunderbird:
  Installato: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
  Candidato: 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
  Tabella versione:
 *** 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages
        500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 0
        500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages

Any other suggestions?
Thanks anyway.
Cheers.

[bi-abba (l-epa-m-inonda)]

Hi John.
During all my tests, I've saw a difference between versions of lightning:

generally I see into "thunderbird added components", that it's 2008091718 (build).

But if I force installation of lightning component, web downloaded, it has build 2009040813.

Which one is, in Your opinion, the right one?
Thanks a lot.

Cheers.

[John Vivirito (gnomefreak)]

On 10/13/2009 04:28 AM, bi-abba wrote:
> Hi John.
> During all my tests, I've saw a difference between versions of lightning:
>
> generally I see into "thunderbird added components", that it's
> 2008091718 (build).
>
> But if I force installation of lightning component, web downloaded, it
> has build 2009040813.
>
> Which one is, in Your opinion, the right one?
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Cheers.
>
the one you got from upstream is more than likely 1.0 not 0.9.
my suggestion is to wait for me to package 1.0. At this time
there is a problem with mozilla-devscripts that needs to be
addressed before i can package 1.0 since sunbird may never
reach a version higher than a beta.

I am still unable to reproduce this bug so i have a feeling it
is a local problem more than a packaging problem

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[John Vivirito (gnomefreak)]

I am updating status to invalid since i still can not reproduce this bug so i still feel it is a profile issue or a problem that is only on your system.