Ubuntu
gedit package

gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last()

Bug #423354 reported by mama21mama on 2009-09-02

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #401934: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_list_last(). Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	gedit (Ubuntu)	New	Medium	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gedit

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Mon Aug 31 17:50:12 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gedit
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gedit 2.27.5-0ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: gedit /home/username/.xchat2/xchatlogs/FreeNode-#supremos.log
ProcEnviron:
LANG=es_AR.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
Segfault happened at: 0xb76ee6f2 <g_list_last+18>: mov 0x4(%eax),%edx
PC (0xb76ee6f2) ok
source "0x4(%eax)" (0xaaaaaaae) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
destination "%edx" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gedit
StacktraceTop:
g_list_last () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
gdk_window_ensure_native ()
?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID ()
g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last()
Uname: Linux 2.6.30.4-010809 i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Tags:

Revision history for this message

mama21mama (mama21mama2000) wrote on 2009-09-02:

Dependencies.txt Edit (3.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Disassembly.txt Edit (766 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (28.9 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (753 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Registers.txt Edit (508 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Stacktrace.txt Edit (1.5 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (2.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote on 2009-09-04:

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

security vulnerability:	yes → no
visibility:	private → public

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2009-09-05: Stacktrace.txt (retraced)

Stacktrace.txt (retraced) Edit (6.2 KiB, text/plain)

StacktraceTop:IA__g_list_last (list=0xaaaaaaaa)
IA__gdk_window_end_paint (window=0x8ceb738)
IA__gtk_text_view_scroll_to_iter (text_view=0x8c620b0,
IA__g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (closure=0x8c6d440,
IA__g_closure_invoke (closure=0x8c6d440, return_value=0x0,