New great version 1.0 released

Bug #418825 reported by Martin Nowack
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
kmymoney2 (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
kmymoney2 (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: kmymoney2

Hi,
like mentioned a new version was released:
http://kmymoney2.sourceforge.net/index-home.html

* it is based on KDE 4.*
* many bugfixes

Revision history for this message
Micha Lenk (micha) wrote :

Sorry, Martin, AFAIK it's *not* based on KDE 4.x.

But I second this request for KMyMoney2 1.0 in Ubuntu.

Changed in kmymoney2 (Debian):
status: Unknown → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Hei Ku (asoliverez) wrote :

I can confirm it is NOT a KDE4 version.

A KDE4 version is underway, but 1.0 is KDE3.

Changed in kmymoney2 (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Thomas (echidnaman) wrote :

Once Debian gets 1.0.1 I'll file a Feature Freeze/sync from Debian request for the kmymoney2 and kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking.

Revision history for this message
tjk (tim-klassen) wrote :

Why isn't KMM2 ver 1.0 packaged already! I was trying to get some help with the app, and finally figured out that my current version from the Ubuntu repository was .9.2!! There have been a large number of improvements since then, no wonder I didn't know what the people at the forum were talking about, the features don't exist in .9.2!! This app needs an immediate update package. It's unfortunate that I have to enter private ppds for an update version of 1.0.0. BTW, it appears to be working perfectly.

I've noticed this lack of updating app packages elsewhere (eg KPhotoAlbum is far behind), and I've had to also acquire privately compiled versions. Is there some problem with not being able to maintain the Ubuntu upgrade repository with current versions?

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Thomas (echidnaman) wrote :

Usually this package would be synced from Debian as soon as it was updated there. The only thing is that we are past both Debian import freeze (so these syncs have to be requested manually) and since a few days before 1.0 was released, Feature Freeze. This means that to get an exception for feature freeze, one must go through a bunch of red tape. If Debian's going to update to 1.0.1 in the next few days, it'll be worth it (for me) to wait a few days instead of going through all that twice. If you want to request a sync yourself, go right ahead.

Freeze exception request documentation can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess

Revision history for this message
Hei Ku (asoliverez) wrote :

Please wait for 1.0.1, because a critical bug went into 1.0.0. That's what motivated the bugfix release so close after 1.0.0

Revision history for this message
tjk (tim-klassen) wrote : Re: [Bug 418825] Re: New great version 1.0 released

Thanks for your response... I've a better idea how "the packaging
process" works now (especially since I did some research and discovered
what a freeze is). Always something new to learn... :-)

Jonathan Thomas wrote:
> Usually this package would be synced from Debian as soon as it was
> updated there. The only thing is that we are past both Debian import
> freeze (so these syncs have to be requested manually) and since a few
> days before 1.0 was released, Feature Freeze. This means that to get an
> exception for feature freeze, one must go through a bunch of red tape.
> If Debian's going to update to 1.0.1 in the next few days, it'll be
> worth it (for me) to wait a few days instead of going through all that
> twice. If you want to request a sync yourself, go right ahead.
>
> Freeze exception request documentation can be found here:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
>
>

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.