"Failed to run depmod", no clear reason why

Bug #407420 reported by Anders L
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

ubuntu 9.04

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f5d731b0-5530-4298-a43f-26825f3e9d4d
Lsusb:
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: IBM 2647NG8
Package: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic 2.6.28-13.45
ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=ac9ba1f3-5b2e-41a2-97f1-4c81107462dc ro quiet splash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-13.45-generic
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic 2.6.28-13.45 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Revision history for this message
Anders L (alindstrom) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote :

This is pretty thoroughly weird. What's the output when you run these two commands in sequence in a terminal window?

  depmod -a 2.6.28-13-generic
  echo $?

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
summary: - package linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic 2.6.28-13.45 failed to
- install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
- status 1
+ "Failed to run depmod", no clear reason why
Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

You'll need to run depmod as root, so:

sudo -i
depmod -a 2.6.28-13-generic
echo $?

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Bug 330834 (duplicate of this one) offers a clue: a crash report for /sbin/depmod turned up as well.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the issue seems similar to bug #99547

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

I think you're right, Sebastien. Thanks for pointing that out.

Revision history for this message
Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote :

I'm going to go ahead and mark this bug (and all it's duplicates) as a duplicate of bug 99547 which should be resolved as of module-init-tools version 3.10-1 in Karmic. Thanks.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

is there any workaround for jaunty users who have upgrades broken due to that one?

Revision history for this message
Alex Ng'ang'a (lxnganga) wrote :

subscribing...

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.