Default file type folders do not have emblems

Bug #400645 reported by Vincent
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Wishlist
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

Bug Description

Binary package hint: nautilus

With a fresh Ubuntu install, several default folders have been created. However, none of these have emblems, even though for each one of them, namely Videos ("Videos"), Templates ("Generic"), Pictures ("Photos"), Music ("Music") and Documents ("Documents"), have emblems available. I don't suppose this is much work to solve, while it would greatly enhance usability by clearly showing what each folder is for and making them more recognisable.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported, but feel free to report any other bugs you find.

Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Vincent (vinnl) wrote :

You you link to the duplicate bug? I'd like to follow its progress but couldn't find it myself (obviously, as I wouldn't have reported this one otherwise ;-).

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

ideally we wouldn't get hundred of duplicates every week and I would manage to spent some minutes doing the work for you but that's not the case so you should have a look on open nautilus bugs there

Revision history for this message
Vincent (vinnl) wrote :

Yeah, I guess I'm spoiled from Xfce.

Still, I've just put some more effort into finding the duplicate bug, but there really seems to be none, neither upstream nor here. I've tried all search terms I could think of. I'm willing to report this upstream as I suppose that's a more appropriate location, but I seriously doubt this bug has been reported before...

(Also, I don't think marking as Invalid is appropriate here, you can also mark a bug as duplicate without having the ID of the duplicate bug. Should I correct that if you're sure it's a duplicate?)

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

> you can also mark a bug as duplicate without having the ID of the duplicate bug

how?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the bug number there is bug #126103

Revision history for this message
Vincent (vinnl) wrote :

Thanks for the link, odd that I didn't find it. Sorry for the extra work...

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.