UVF exception 0.40 (libetpan3) -> 0.45 (libetpan6)

[Ante Karamatić]

Only two packages depend on libetpan3:

sylpheed-claws-gtk2
etpan-ng

etpan-ng will probably break, but version in dapper is outdated, while sylpheed-claws-gtk2 needs new libetpan6 (would close: 31112, 32215 and 39490). Also, new libetpan builds against libgnutls12 wich is in main.

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

diffstat

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

ChangeLog

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

buildlog

[Sebastian Dröge (slomo)]

breaking things doesn't sound that good... could etpan-ng be fixed to work with the new version?

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

New version - yes. Old one - no. So, that would require another UVF.

[Daniel Holbach (dholbach)]

If we can fix etpan-ng at a 'low cost', libetpan3 update look generally good to me.

[Reinhard Tartler (siretart)]

As per discussion on IRC, ivoks is willing to get all affected packages back to shape. setting to confirmed.

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

Of course, etpan-ng will also be updated. Subscribing ubuntu-archive and requesting sync from Debian.

Thank you.

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

Changing status to Unconfirmed to get new confirmation from Archivers.

[Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott)]

There are Ubuntu changes in libetpan, please confirm that it's ok to overwrite those.

[Ante Karamatić (ivoks)]

Yes, it's ok.

[Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott)]

Blocked by bug #40958.