apcupsd <defunct> process death

Bug #391000 reported by amichair
22
This bug affects 5 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apcupsd (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: apcupsd

On Kubuntu Jaunty 9.04 connected to an APC SUA750I, I installed the stock apcupsd 3.14.4-1 via apt-get. A couple configuration tweaks (ISCONFIGURED=yes, USPCABLE usb, UPSTYPE usb, Device <blank>), and it worked great - running apcaccess shows the status correctly.

However, after a reboot, or after an indeterminate amount of time passes, running apcaccess results in a connection error, and ps shows the apcupsd process dead as "apcupsd <defunct>". I've also seen variants in which apcupsd is ok and apccontrol is <defunct>, or when both are <defunct>. Once this state is reached, the only way out of it is to kill -9 apcupsd, and start it again manually (sudo /etc/init.d/apcupsd start), after which apcaccess once again works. Sometimes within a few seconds, or the next consecutive call to apcaccess, it is already dead again, and sometimes it can keep working for a long while before this recurs. This may be caused by losing USB connectivity (I've seen some indication in the logs), though of course the pc and ups remain on and physically connected the whole time.

So the bug is twofold:

First, apcupsd should never die because of an error accessing the usb - it should keep polling as usual until it's reconnected, and report the appropriate status in any case, whether online or disconnected.

Second, it shouldn't be losing connectivity when everything remains connected. This may or may not be a bug in apcupsd - maybe it's the usb drivers or something else - I don't know. But it's a problem.

Revision history for this message
amichair (amichai2) wrote :

I still see this happening on Kubuntu Lucid 10.04 amd64.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in apcupsd (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Seb Bonnard (sebma) wrote :

Hi, it still occurs in Ubuntu 22.04.

BTW: Do I need this package on a virtual machine ?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.