Sync twitux 0.69-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
twitux (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Wishlist
|
Jacob Peddicord |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: twitux
Please sync twitux 0.69-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
All Ubuntu changes were for new upstream releases that had not quite made
their way to Debian.
* 0.62-0ubuntu1 - New upstream version
* 0.68-0ubuntu1:
- Patch rules were dropped as well in Debian
- Extra build-deps were added in Debian
* 0.69-0ubuntu1:
- --enable-aspell switched out for --enable-spell in Debian
- build-dep on libenchant-dev added in Debian
- libaspell dropped in Debian
All of these changes can be safely replaced by 0.69-3 in unstable.
Changelog since current karmic version 0.69-0ubuntu1:
twitux (0.69-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove /var/lib/
-- Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <email address hidden> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:37:12 -0700
twitux (0.69-2) unstable; urgency=low
* 0.69 can be uploaded to unstable, now that all our dependencies are there.
* Bump standards version to 3.8.1. No changes.
-- Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <email address hidden> Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:20:55 -0700
twitux (0.69-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New Upstream Release.
- Fixes unescaped <, > and & (Closes: #512533).
* We carry no more patches to upstream, so remove quilt build dependency.
-- Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <email address hidden> Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:53:38 -0800
Changed in twitux (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Nathan Handler (nhandler) |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in twitux (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Jacob Peddicord (jpeddicord) → Nathan Handler (nhandler) |
status: | Incomplete → In Progress |
Jacob, it does not look like Debian has a Build-Depends on 'rarian-compat', which was added in 0.68-0ubuntu1. Also, in Ubuntu, we have versioned Build-Depends on gnome-doc-utils and intltool. Do we really need a certain version of these packages? Are these changes still needed? If so, you might consider contacting the Debian Maintainer and seeing if they will add it in Debian. That way we can sync the package instead of merging it. If the changes can be dropped, please say so, and we can go ahead with the sync.