cannot get nspluginwrapper to install (segmentation fault)

[DC]

Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper

Ubuntu 9.04 64bit.

A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
Setting up nspluginwrapper (1.2.2-0ubuntu5) ...
plugin dirs: :/var/lib/flashplugin-installer/
Auto-update plugins from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Auto-update plugins from /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins
Auto-update plugins from /usr/lib/firefox/plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/lib/firefox/plugins
Segmentation fault
dpkg: error processing nspluginwrapper (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of flashplugin-installer:
 flashplugin-installer depends on nspluginwrapper (>= 0.9.91.4-2ubuntu1); however:
  Package nspluginwrapper is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing flashplugin-installer (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of flashplugin-nonfree:
 flashplugin-nonfree depends on flashplugin-installer; however:
  Package flashplugin-installer is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 nspluginwrapper
 flashplugin-installer
 flashplugin-nonfree

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu5
SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64

[Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel)]

Thanks for your report.

If it's still an issue, can you reproduce this crash by running sudo nspluginwrapper -u -v -a ?
Thanks

[Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel)]

We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future.
To reopen the bug report you can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change the Status back to "New".
Thanks again!