Please copy 0.94.dfsg.2-1ubuntu0.3~dapper1 and rdepends from dapper-backports to dapper-security

[Imre Gergely]

Binary package hint: clamav

This will resolve the following security bugs:

- bug #360502 (bb#1552)
- bug #354190 (#1335, #1462, CVE 2008-6680, CVE 2009-1270)

Source packages that need copying:

clamav 0.94.dfsg.2-1ubuntu0.3~dapper1
avscan 3.2.2-openssl-1build1~dapper1
clamassassin 1.2.4-1~dapper1
clamcour 0.2.2-1.2build1~dapper2
dansguardian 2.9.9.7-2~dapper1
gurlchecker 0.10.2-2ubuntu1~dapper1
havp 0.89-2ubuntu1~dapper1
klamav 0.44-3~dapper1
python-clamav 0.4.1-1build2~dapper1
python-pyclamd 0.1.1-0ubuntu1~dapper1 (new package, needed to replace functions dropped from python-clamav)
php-clamavlib 0.12a-4~dapper2
sylpheed-claws-gtk-clamav 1.0.5-5.1ubuntu0.1~dapper2
sylpheed-claws-gtk2-clamav 2.6.0-1.1ubuntu1.1~dapper2

[Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)]

These need to be rebuilt in the security PPA, so rather than doing a pocket copy, I will do a no change rebuild for each. Also 'sylpheed-claws-gtk-clamav' should be simply 'sylpheed-claws-clamav'.

[Scott Kitterman (kitterman)]

There are two different source packages in Dapper, sylpheed-claws (gtk2
port) and slypheed-claws-gtk (gtk version). I do think we need them both.

[Scott Kitterman (kitterman)]

Silght correction:

sylpheed-claws = GTK 1 version
sylpheed-claws-gtk2 = GTK 2 version

we need them both (OTOH, the chances that these packages have any users are roughly nil, so I'm reasonably certain I'm not very excited either way - I just like to be complete).

[Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)]

Yeah, I wasn't commenting on sylpheed-claws-* worth, just that sylpheed-claws-gtk-clamav should be 'sylpheed-claws' (I know I said sylpheed-claws-clamav, but I meant sylpheed-claws ;). I am working on these now.

[Scott Kitterman (kitterman)]

Ah, right. Source package versus binary package. Got it. I'm slow today.

[Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)]

clamav (0.94.dfsg.2-1ubuntu0.3~dapper2) dapper-security; urgency=low

  * No change rebuild from backports