UVF-Request: sqlite 2.8.17

Bug #36732 reported by André Klitzing
8
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
sqlite (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
MOTU Release Team

Bug Description

It's only a little change in "new" sqlite 2.x version. It would be better to include it to avoid corruption.

2005 December 19 (2.8.17)
* Fix an obscure bug that can cause database corruption under the following unusual circumstances: A large INSERT or UPDATE statement which is part of an even larger transaction fails due to a uniqueness contraint but the containing transaction commits.

Revision history for this message
André Klitzing (misery) wrote : diffstat

diffstat from 2.8.16 to 2.8.17

Revision history for this message
André Klitzing (misery) wrote : diff

diff from 2.8.16 to 2.8.17

Changed in sqlite:
assignee: nobody → motu-uvf
Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

sqlite is in main, there's nothing MOTU-UVF can do. Ask Matt Zimmerman or Colin Watson for main packages.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Matt, what do you think? To me the change looks fairly safe and worthwhile.

Revision history for this message
André Klitzing (misery) wrote :

Oh... I didn't see that libsqlite0 is in main. I only saw "universe" for sqlite.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

apt-cache showsrc <sourcepackage|package> knows. Sometimes source packages in main have some of their binary packages in Universe.

daniel@bert:~/update/ubuntu-docs-6.03.5$ apt-cache showsrc sqlite | grep Dir
Directory: pool/main/s/sqlite
daniel@bert:~/update/ubuntu-docs-6.03.5$

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : Re: [Bug 36732] UVF-Request: sqlite 2.8.17

On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:04:02PM -0000, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/36732
>
> Comment:
> Matt, what do you think? To me the change looks fairly safe and
> worthwhile.

Looks like an interface change to me; please check that (and send unified
diffs in the future).

--
 - mdz

Changed in sqlite:
status: Unconfirmed → Needs Info
Revision history for this message
André Klitzing (misery) wrote :

I asked at SQLite developers...

Answer:
No. SQLite never changes its interface (except in backwards compatible
ways) unless the first number in the version changes. So there was
an interface change from 2.x.x to 3.x.x (in 2004). But there have been
no other incompatible interface changes.

Revision history for this message
André Klitzing (misery) wrote :

Info is added... needs to confirm!

Changed in sqlite:
status: Needs Info → Unconfirmed
Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

If it's backward compatible, it's fine with me. It isn't packaged in Debian yet, though, so there's no existing package to sync.

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Matt, are you fine with the update at this point? I have an updated package locally

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Yes, as above

André Klitzing (misery)
Changed in sqlite:
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

thanks, uploaded 2.8.17-0ubuntu1 some seconds ago

Changed in sqlite:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Patches

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.