eucalpytus-nc uses "//etc/" pathnames instead of "/etc"

Bug #365058 reported by Loïc Minier
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #430163: Cloud/Walrus/SC init script confusing. Edit Remove
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Eucalyptus
New
Undecided
Unassigned
eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Triaged
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi,

eucalyptus-nc starts with inconsistent (and ugly ;-) pathnames:
# ps fauxw | grep eucaly
root 15886 0.0 0.0 7540 908 pts/13 S+ 12:23 0:00 | | \_ grep --color=auto eucaly
root 14791 0.0 0.0 107056 2380 ? Ss 11:59 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -f /etc/eucalyptus/httpd-cc.conf
121 14792 0.0 0.0 374328 5080 ? Sl 11:59 0:00 \_ /usr/sbin/apache2 -f /etc/eucalyptus/httpd-cc.conf
root 15257 0.0 0.0 107056 2380 ? Ss 11:59 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -f //etc/eucalyptus/httpd-nc.conf
121 15267 0.0 0.0 177360 4772 ? Sl 11:59 0:00 \_ /usr/sbin/apache2 -f //etc/eucalyptus/httpd-nc.conf

Note the "//" in the nc config file.

It seems that the init scripts were implemented differently; would be nice to be consistent and avoid "//" in pathnames.

Thanks,

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: eucalyptus-nc 1.5~bzr266-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
SourcePackage: eucalyptus
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Matt Zimmerman (mdz)
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu):
status: New → Triaged
importance: Low → Wishlist
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

Care to explain why it wont fix?

Revision history for this message
Dustin Kirkland  (kirkland) wrote : Re: [Bug 365058] Re: eucalpytus-nc uses "//etc/" pathnames instead of "/etc"

Sorry, Loic.

There are deep fundamental problems with Eucalyptus that we're trying
to fix--packaging, installation, runtime.

Something cosmetic like this, we probably won't get around to.

You can reopen it, if you like, mark it confirmed and leave it
wishlist. I just doubt upstream (or us) is ever going to fix it.

:-Dustin

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

I marked it triaged; I had a look at the init scripts and find them relatively ugly; I offered upstream to spend some time revamping them if they agree with the approach. I think the original issue I reported is one of the many symptoms of the overly complex init scripts, so even if it would be trivial to mask this symptom (e.g. by stripping / from EUCALYPTUS in the init script(s)), I think it's better to clean up the scripts massively.

Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu):
status: Won't Fix → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Thierry Carrez (ttx) wrote :

Loic: this is part of the global initscript rewrite effort, see bug 430163 for more details.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.