evil breezy unmounting action due to async filesystem
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nautilus |
Fix Released
|
High
|
|||
nautilus (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Martin Pitt |
Bug Description
When I plug in my vorbis player:
/dev/sdb1 on /media/IAUDIO type vfat
(rw,noexec,
I seem to remember that hoary used to mount vfat volumes sync. jdub told me
that there's no such thing as 'sync' for vfat filesystems, so I'm not sure if
that's the problem.
Either way, behaviour on unmount is much worse on breezy than it was on hoary.
With hoary the data would be written to the volume fairly quickly within
requesting an unmount and with breezy it takes an awful long time (sometimes
minutes).
This is bad since I have no way of knowing when it's safe to unplug the device
without looking at /proc/mounts or typing 'sync' into a terminal and waiting.
This will be a nightmare for people in my family, at least, since they are all
heavy users of their mp3 players. I'm not looking forward to having to explain
this to them.
Request: either make it so that reads/writes to removeable devices are done
synchronously or give some sort of user feedback on unmount about when it's safe
to unplug a device.
Cheers.
http://
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | Unconfirmed → Confirmed |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
Changed in nautilus: | |
importance: | Unknown → High |
The change is probably this one:
pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high
* Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge. patches/ 02-async_ by_default. patch:
* Added debian/
- Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid
physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT
structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad side
this makes it much less safe to remove devices without proper umounting.
- Replace option "--async" with option "--sync".
- Document change in the manpages.
- Closes: #309591
* debian/control: Correct package priority to optional, to match the katie
overrides.
-- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Wed, 18 May 2005 15:41:13 +0200
Martin, any opinion on this?